EEOC and Home Healthcare Agency Settle Over GINA Violations

EEOC and Home Healthcare Agency Settle Over GINA Violations

BNV Home Care Agency, Inc. (BNV), a home health care business based in New York, was recently the defendant in a claim alleging the company violated provisions of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA), which became law in 2009. Title II of this Act makes it unlawful to discriminate against employees or job applicants based on genetic information. GINA forbids an employer from making employment decisions because of genetic information and places restrictions on requesting, requiring, purchasing and disclosing such information. Like other federal employment discrimination laws, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the agency that oversees and enforces the workplace provisions of GINA.

GINA Prohibits Using Genetic Information to Discriminate

The premise behind GINA is that an employer may never use genetic information because it is irrelevant to a person’s ability to work at the current time. Using genetic information to make any decision about hiring, firing, assigning work, compensating or providing benefits is discriminatory. Harassing someone because of their genetics is also unlawful, as is retaliating for complaining or reporting such behavior. Employers may not disclose genetic information – it must almost always be kept confidential.

Under GINA it is usually illegal for an employer to get the genetic information of an applicant or employee. According to the EEOC, there are some very narrow exceptions. They are:

  • Employers who are in the business of conducting DNA testing for law enforcement may use genetic information of employees for very specific purposes and under strictly controlled conditions.
  • Accidental acquisition of information such as by overhearing a conversation
  • Genetic information obtained as part of a wellness program that is voluntary and meets specific requirements
  • Genetic information found in public or commercial documents such as a newspaper or magazine as long as the employer is not purposefully accessing publications designed to provide genetic information
  • Family medical history received as part of a certified FMLA leave to care for a relative
  • Information received as part of a genetic monitoring program that studies the effect of toxins in the workplace under very specific conditions and requirements

Health Care Company Based in New York has Allegedly been Violating GINA for Years

According to Home Health Care News, The EEOC filed a discrimination case against BNV Home Care Agency in 2014. The lawsuit alleged that the company, which provides companionship and care services for senior citizens in New York, including Brooklyn, New York City, Westchester, Queens and Staten Island, violated GINA by unlawfully asking for genetic information when it requested family medical histories from employees.

According to the complaint, BNV asked employees, and applicants who were given conditional offers of employment but not yet fully hired, to complete an “Employee Health Assessment Form.” The form, used by the company since 2009, required each person to check “yes” or “no” to “indicate illness experienced by you or your family.” The 29 health conditions listed on the form included, among other things, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure and mental illness. The complaint alleges that BNV’s practice violates GINA because it unlawfully asks for genetic information, and the information as used by BNV causes adverse consequences for employees and conditional employees.

Company Agrees to Pay Monetary Damages for Workplace Discrimination

The parties settled the case, and BNV signed a consent decree. Under the terms of the settlement, BNV will pay the aggrieved employees and applicants $125,000. According to one report, “The company will also be required to remove questions about genetic information from its assessments as well as conduct anti-discrimination training.” Judy Kenan, acting New York District Director of the EEOC stated, “Forcing employees and applicants to provide genetic information in order to maintain or obtain their jobs is clearly against federal law, and EEOC will continue to combat this form of discrimination.”

Contact Us

It may be difficult for you to determine whether your employer is using or trying to use your genetic information to discriminate. Has your supervisor asked personal questions about your family medical history? Did you fill out a medical history form before or during a job interview? Have your conditions of employment changed after sharing health information?

Keep an eye out for indications that your employer may be violating GINA. If you have any questions about discrimination in the workplace or wish to discuss filing a claim with the EEOC, contact experienced New York employment lawyers at Leeds Brown. Someone is available to take your call 24/7 at 1-800-585-4658.

 

Free Consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Testimonials

Shortly after beginning medical school, I experienced some academic difficulties. After seeing my physicians, I was diagnosed with ADHD. After I started receiving specific treatment for ADHD, I requested the school to accommodate me for the disability as recommended by my physician. One of the requests made was for extended time to take my exams. The extension of time was granted...

~Kenneth Broodo, Esq.

Partner at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
I hired Lenard Leeds, Esq. to assist me with my wrongful termination. I was let go of my position because of my age. I was not only told to take a decrease in pay but also required to work fewer hours to do the same job. Additionally, they kept asking me “When are you going to retire?” I visited the...

~SanFranReview

I want to thank you again for assisting me in overseeing my issues with my employer. This is the second time I have used Lenard Leeds, Esq. to fight for me. This time I was a National Sales Manager of a drug company, where acts of discrimination based on my age, national origin and retaliation took place. Mr. Leeds and...

~Law Professor

Discrimination Case

$19 Million

Settlement Secured in a National Origin
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

LONG ISLAND

One Old Country Road, Suite 347 Carle Place, NY 11514

516-873-9550

get directions

DOWNTOWN

570 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1600A New York, NY 10022

212-661-4370

get directions

DOWNTOWN NYC

101 Greenwich Street, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10006

800-585-4658

get directions
Call Now!